Welcome to the biggest crime that’s ever been committed


It’s 4.18.

Last night I went to see Kate Tempest perform Let Them Eat Chaos. The title of this post is a line from Tunnel Vision, the last section of this epic poem about the collapse we are in right now. The whole poem follows 7 people who are awake at 4.18, opening their doors to face the coming storm.

“What we gonna do to wake up?
We sleep so deep, it don’t matter how they shake us.
If we can’t face it, we can’t escape it.
But tonight the storm’s come.”

The storm’s come.

I’m ruminating. I feel like an air traffic controller, trying to track lots of routes, weather changes and threats for hours on end but the planes keep disappearing, the fog rolls in, the threats grow bigger. The ruminating is a background hum behind my work, my sleep, my conversations. It’s continually fed by news about Brexit, about Trump, about fake news, about the extent of Arctic sea ice. I’m trying to work out how it all fits together. In particular, right now, I have two big questions that are closely linked, although they may not seem to be at first sight.

Question one: Why are fossil fuel industries, especially oil companies, so targeted in protests about their influence as sponsors, when there are so many other unethical kinds of companies such as arms dealers, car makers or banks? Aren’t their ethical failings and merits all relative?

Question two: Are we right to assume that the divisions between centrist/left liberal co-operativists and right or left populist separatists (UKIP, Trumpets, Lexiters etc) are mainly due to socio-economic differences between these two groups? Is it accurate or helpful to draw such a clear division line between affluent influential liberals (as pro-EU/anti-Trump) and the left-behind poor suffering from immigration and globalisation? Is this just a redrawing of the stark fault line drawn between the 1% and the 99%, by the 1%, as a deflection tactic? And in looking for fault lines and how to heal them, why do we pay so little heed to cultural hegemony, especially deliberate ‘perception management‘, and its impact on our psycho-cultural states?

Part of my rumination on these and other questions, trying to connect and make sense of them, is telling stories to myself. I don’t hold out these stories as the firm truth by which we can cross to agreed understanding. They are more like temporary bridges made of rope, from which I might dangle and fall, but maybe somebody else would throw lines from other directions to build a broader net.

Here’s a very short version of one of my fragile bridges:

Fossil fuel companies and oil-dependent countries are at the heart of an industrial-military complex that has:

  • knowingly expanded a system that is rapidly destroying the life-sustaining capacities of the planet, such that civilisation is liable to collapse this century,
  • has fought and fanned flames of wars over oil, and seems willing to continue stirring conflict as a means to exert control and frustrate efforts to build a sustainable peace,
  • have funded cadres of
  • has fed a misinformation machine in order to spread denial of this science, to weaken collaboration on climate action, to deflect blame from these wrongs, and to sow confusion and division.

As part of this, Russia, an oil-based country led by oil barons, has funded right-wing groups across Europe, manipulated press and online news and supported Trump, in order to break apart the EU and weaken NATO, with the intention of exerting more power.

The media is owned by oily oligarchs and is influenced by the lobbying and bribes of oil-based industries who want to believe, and want us to believe, that we have decades to tackle climate change, by which time they will have accumulated enough to create techno-utopian cities. Their ‘perception management’ and media influence has been underestimated in attempts to work out why people voted for Brexit and Trump.

And here’s a much longer version…throughout which you have to imagine are lots of question marks.


Fossil fuel revolution:

The background to this story is the formation of nation states, and international competition to establish empires, based on the plundering natural resources and the genocide and slavery of indigenous people. Lines of division between exploiter and exploited were more clearly drawn, on a larger global scale than ever before.

The industrial revolution, the growth of cities and rapidity of transport were all powered by fossil fuels (coal and then oil and gas) enabling steel engineering, roads, shipping of goods, and a globalised consumer culture. Oil-fuelled transportation and chemicals derived from oil massively increased agricultural yields, leading to a global population increase. In turn, this growing population ramped up the demand for food and goods.

Fossil fuel wars:

Big shifts in imperial power led to WW1 and WW2, both of which expanded their fields of action due to battles over supply of oil and other resources. Hitler was obsessed with oil, as well as Aryan purity. Japan’s involvement in WW2 was triggered by its need to protect oil supplies to support their imperial ambitions. Oil fed the war machines and helped feed and grow populations to fight for empires. A vicious circle of war for oil (and other resources) by oil, so in turn, for more oil. Wars over oil in the Middle East are not a recent phenomenon and Britain has played a key role in the long history of oil conflicts.

Global division and also co-operation:

Communism transmuted from a theory based on an ethos of social distribution to a phenomenon of vast totalitarian states, leading to global division between these states and the ‘free world’, culminating in the Cold War. To a certain extent, there has been a benign legacy, of the World Wars and the Cold War in terms of international collaboration in the creation of the United Nations, NATO, the European Union, anti-nuclear proliferation treaties, international co-operation to tackle climate change, action on poverty and on human rights abuses. The neo-liberals blame international institutions for imposing too many limits on free trade and profit, and the left wing blames them for fuelling and protecting neo-liberalism. Their international scope makes them vulnerable to being used as straw men, as the EU has been in the Brexit campaign.

The more malign legacies of this co-operativism included a conflation of socialism with totalitarianism, and a repression of movements to protect the commons and to distribute resources.

Companies vs the living planet:

Although many accuse these benign international initiatives, such as the EU and UN, of being too pro-environment, in fact they have been inadequately so. Environmental policies are characterised as a nuisance, seen only as a minimal check on necessary production in order to provide for the needy masses. In fact, they are popular with citizens, but these laws have been consistently hobbled by corporate interests. Companies, their lawyers and their bribed political advocates have wrangled to avoid taxes, water down regulations, and lobbied and sued for rights, subsidies and protections that allow them to extract and profit from natural resources without replenishing them or compensating local people. Large companies operate only within national parameters when it is for their benefit, but increasingly exist as supranational organisations, some more powerful than any governments, and are driving globalisation.

Freedom to profit spreads east:

Neo-liberalism spread in the 1980s, leading Russia, China and other states to open up to free trade and to profit from their extraction of fossil fuels. Russia is now powered by the interests of the oil industry. China has burnt coal and vastly deforested and mined its land, as well as lands in Africa, and although it is making a show of transitioning to renewable energy it remains a significant global polluter.

Free trade does not ultimately mean freedom to express your views, it only means freedom to exploit and profit. The more that people start to suffer from that exploitation and accumulation of profit, the more that freedom of expression is repressed.

Development vs stewarded wilderness and indigenous people:

The emergence of international development for the ‘Third World’, although with benign intentions, led to great losses of stewarded wilderness and biodiverse farmland, which also harmed traditional knowledge and languages. Many people became dependent on employment in order to buy food/goods, and when war or natural disaster struck (as it increasingly does now) are also dependent on the provision of aid. People moved to cities. Their land was grabbed and deforested by large corporations and countries for agribusiness (biofuels, drug crops, high calorie crops, plantation forests etc.), oil and mining. More people moved to cities (or slums and refugee camps) and civil wars erupted.

Engineered inequality:

The neo-liberal economic system that has spread around the world is rigged through governance, taxes, patents and trade deals to accumulate wealth in the hands of the 1% and to continually squeeze it from the 99%. After the crash of 2008, more people in the Global North lost their insulating cushions of jobs and just-about affordable debt, and became aware of the vast scam of the system. Bankers were seen as the very devil, and as even worse devils when the governments rescued banks with quantitative easing. Only Iceland imprisoned their most crooked bankers.

The status quo of ‘the global race’ resumed:

The financial system was exposed as a ‘house of cards’, but the assumption was that this system rested on nothing, that money was conjured out of nothing. In fact, it rests on the unsustainable exploitation of natural commodities and human labour. Some companies have become more powerful than many countries, and in turn, many countries are now seeking to operate exactly like companies. In these countries, the Government now see it as their job to accumulate wealth in competition with other nations, to feed a nationalistic talent pipeline, to defend borders and to seek new resources that they can exploit without having to pay too much heed to the environmental externalities or the human collateral damage.

The global race also involves the accumulation of wealth by a few who waste resources, and in turn ‘the many’ are encouraged to earn and consume in aspiration of the wealthy. People, more and more across the world, are caught in a system designed by industrialists that forces them to work, consume and waste. And to move to find paid work rather than to regenerate their own ecosystems.

Meanwhile, eyes were off the ball games of the oligarchs:

The problem is that this planet isn’t big enough to sustain this rapacious and violent growth.

Some countries consume oil unsustainably and have intervened increasingly in civil wars of countries with oil supplies, seeding uncertainty and blaming sectarian divides, as a tactic to exert control. These interventions were extremely expensive, devastating to millions of lives, and exacerbated the rise of Al Qaeda and ISIL/Daesh who have unleashed terrorism across the Middle East and in Western cities.

In a particularly toxic trap, refugees from Middle Eastern and African wars that have arisen from oil conflict, the funding of insurgents and the pressures of climate change, are being characterised as leeches, rapists and terrorists. They are being used as a scapegoat in a rising tide of Neo-Nazism. An investigation by Nafeez Ahmed for Tell Mama, shows how the fascism which motivated Jo Cox’s killer has been “incubated by a global neo-Nazi network with significant access to the corridors of power in the West”.

5 of the 9 planetary boundaries are related to fossil fuels:

Meanwhile, due to emissions of fossil fuels, climate change has accelerated so much that we have now passed at least one key tipping point, so that catastrophic effects are happening now, including drought affecting food supplies, massive forest fires, more severe earthquakes and rising sea levels. There are several tipping point thresholds, poised to strike, some of them potentially adding the equivalent of 25% of all our CO2 emissions over the past 25 years. As Jonathan Porritt sums up Peter Wadham’s book about this: “The sea ice Death Spiral, plus the diminution in the albedo effect, plus the melting Greenland ice cap, plus five further feedback loops, plus a mega-methane-pulse; when exactly did Apocalypse Tomorrow become Apocalypse Now?”

And, it’s not just climate change: The knock-on effects of an oil-based industrial system also cause major issues of pollution of air, water and soil, damaging human health, and destroying habitats. For just one of many possible examples, exploring new drilling sites for oil involves seismic blasting that is damaging to marine mammals and triggers earthquakes.

The fossil fuel industries knew in 1981 or earlier that they would cause these catastrophic effects:

The global climate began to warm in the 19th century and science proved that this was due to human burning of fossil fuels in 1885. This science was further confirmed when carbon monitoring stations were established and by 1980 the consensus was building. The fossil fuel industries could have turned their profits towards a transition towards a regenerative economy based on renewable energy. The knowledge of some of these technologies existed at this time but people calling for change to a more ecological system were belittled and silenced. The fossil fuel industries (and their fellows) poured billions of dollars into an international misinformation machine, gaining control of mainstream media and recruiting armies of social media commenters, who aim to deny the consensus on climate change, promote billionaires as philanthropists and derail any movements for eco-social justice. As George Monbiot explains, the social and environmental justice campaigners beating themselves up about what went wrong should recognise that “we have simply been outspent. Not by a little, but by orders of magnitude”.

The internet is a key tool in the tactics of this octopus-like lobby. It enables thousands of agents to be employed to spread misinformation, to distract attention from vital news, to deflect blame and to turn arguments off logical courses. Any news article about climate change has, dangling from it, hundreds of comments that say, apart from basic denial of climate science, points such as ‘we are all to blame, everyone of us, for consuming oil products so you, environmentalist, are a hypocrite’.

As the tipping points of climate change start to kick in, the machine of denial is ramping up ever more forcefully:

Trump has appointed climate deniers to his team and the transition team has already begun to harrass climate scientists, and have stated they will cancel NASA’s internationally vital climate change research. Trump plans to run America like a company, but not just any company, his own company, and enriching his own family, and by extension his extended family of Americans like him.

The melting of the Arctic means that new sources of oil are opening up, but most of that access is held by Russia negotiated in a 500 billion dollar deal with Rex Tillerson, the CEO of Exxon, albeit hampered by sanctions imposed by the US over Ukraine. Perhaps this explains why Trump has been helped to his election by Putin, and why Trump has picked the ex-Exxon CEO to be his secretary of state.

Part of this misinformation machine has been through cultural sponsorship:

The oil industry has also made strategic use of sponsorship of culture, education and sport, washing their brands clean and gaining a ‘social licence to operate’.

Some other industries also make use of cultural sponsorship for the same desire to gain acceptability. They are not separate from the fossil fuel industries. The financial, chemical, transport and arms industries all benefit from the fossil-fuel dependent status quo, they fund and defend their activities, and they are part of the lobby machine that is led by the fossil fuel industries.

So, what is the biggest crime that has ever been committed? I argue that it is causing, denying and continuing to exacerbate global climate disruption that is poised to raise the temperature within this century to an unliveable rate, while at the same time seeding conflicts and political division in order to continue to secure supplies of the evil stuff. As Kurt Vonnegut said “Dear future generations, please accept our apologies. We were rolling drunk on petroleum”. But the pushers must take the blame, not the addicts.

It’s 9.23 am.


NOTE: The definitive version of this article is on Medium

2 responses to “Welcome to the biggest crime that’s ever been committed

  1. Pingback: Losing the Planet | The Learning Planet·

  2. Pingback: Losing the Planet? – Climate Museum UK·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s